The IDPC membership survey was shared with IDPC members in English, French and Spanish on 18 November 2019 and received responses until 13 December 2019. Out of IDPC’s 195 member organisations, we received 65 eligible responses (i.e. 33% of IDPC’s members. Responses originated from 45 individual countries, with four responses adopting a regional or multi-national outlook. In terms of regional representation, Latin America (18 responses), Sub-Saharan Africa (16) and Western Europe (11 responses) provided the highest amount of responses, followed by Eurasia (5), South East Europe (4), North America (3), South East Asia (2), South Asia (2), the MENA region (2) and Oceania (1).

IDPC Membership Survey 2018: Summary of results

IDPC Membership Survey 2019: Summary of results

This document, ‘The International Standards for the Treatment of Drug Use Disorders‘ (hereafter the Standards), is the work of UNODC and WHO to support Member States in their efforts to develop and expand effective, evidence-based and ethical treatment for drug use disorders.The Standards are intended for all those involved in the policy development, planning, funding, delivery, monitoring and evaluation of treatment services and interventions for drug use disorders.This document is based on currently available scientific evidence on treatment for drug use disorders and sets out a framework for the implementation of the Standards, in line with principles of public health care. The Standards identify major components and features of effective systems for the treatment of drug use disorders. They describe treatment modalities and interventions to match the needs of people at different stages and severities of drug use disorders, in a manner consistent with the treatment of any chronic disease or health condition.

International standards for the treatment of drug use disorders (2020 edition)

By Diederik Lohman & Damon Barrett / BMC International Health and Human Rights

Recent years have seen contentious debate about efforts to schedule medicines such as ketamine and tramadol under the international drug control conventions. Proponents argue that misuse poses a significant risk to public health and that scheduling would help address these problems. However, scheduling of medicines can negatively affect their availability, accessibility and affordability for medical purposes, with serious health consequences for patients, especially in low and middle-income countries. The current process for scheduling medicines under the international drug control conventions does not provide sufficient normative standards through which balanced decisions may be reached. It is undemocratic in its structure and opaque in its reasoning. In this article, we argue that such decisions represent de facto limitations on the right to health and may engage the principle of non-retrogression. Using the examples of ketamine and tramadol, we propose that standard legal tests in international human rights law can help to address the normative and democratic deficits in the system and produce more rigorous, fairer and more transparent decisions.

Scheduling medicines as controlled substances: Addressing normative and democratic gaps through human rights-based analysis

By Axel Klein & Vicki J. Hanson / Interdisciplinary Centre for Cannabis Research

In 2015 Jamaica decriminalised the possession of two ounces of cannabis and the cultivation of five plants per household for personaluse, and allowed licensed cultivation and trade for medical and religious uses ...

The Dangerous Drug Act Amendment (DDAA) has dramatically changed some aspects of law enforcement and eased the tensions between the community and the police. Cannabis p>mers, particularly young men, are no longer subject to police harassment.

A number of cannabis dispensaries and herb houses have built up thriving businesses, but small farmers are struggling to reap economic benefits from the new opportunities in this emerging industry. The growth of integrated seed to sale businesses will preclude the opportunities for small farmers and processors and should be reviewed.

The Cannabis Licensing Authority (CLA) has increased the speed at which licenses are being awarded,improved communications with applicants and willingly waives or defers fees for small farmers. But the agency by itself cannot overcome structural problems impeding small farmers such as landlessness, lack of capital and the requirements of the International Narcotics Control Board (INCB). The alternative development programme has stalled and needs to be better designed for purpose, funded and supported if obstacles faced by poor farmers are to be overcome.

Ganja licensing in Jamaica: Learning lessons and setting standards

This briefing compiles geographically diverse evidence to enable advocates to make the case for the cost-effectiveness of harm reduction.

This advocacy work has never been more important.

HIV continues to rise among people who inject drugs, yet harm reduction funding is in crisis. Financial support for an effective HIV response for people who inject drugs in low- and middle-income countries totalled US$188 million in 2016 – just one-tenth of the US$1.5 billion that is needed annually by 2020.

International donor funding for harm reduction has reduced by one-quarter over the past decade. Middle-income countries are increasingly vulnerable as donors either reduce or withdraw funding. While many governments are investing more in domestic health and HIV responses, few are substantially investing in harm reduction, even where the need is great.

Making the investment case: Cost-effectiveness evidence for harm reduction

By Nazlee Maghsoudi & Jeanette Bowles & Dan Werb

The increasing incidence of fatal opioid overdose is a public health crisis in Canada. While buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone are the standard first-line of opioid substitution options, limitations, including difficulty achieving long-term retention for some people who use opioids, are well known. For this group, injectable diacetylmorphine or hydromorphone can achieve positive outcomes, including high retention rates, reduced use of unregulated opioids, and reduced criminal activity. In May 2019, Health Canada announced changes to increase the accessibility of diacetylmorphine and hydromorphone, and in September 2019, the CIHR-funded Canadian Research Initiative in Substance Misuse released a national clinical guideline for diacetylmorphine and hydromorphone as additional frontline substitution options. While these developments present opportunities for scale-up, significant financial, structural, and practice barriers continue to impede access. This commentary explores the current state of policy and practice for diacetylmorphine and hydromorphone as opioid substitution options in Canada, outlines the rationale for rapid expansion of access, and highlights clinical and policy changes that must be undertaken or the death toll will continue to rise.

Expanding access to diacetylmorphine and hydromorphone for people who use opioids in Canada

By Goro Koto,1 Masayoshi Tarui,2 Harue Kamioka,3 Kanna Hayashi4

1. Japan Advocacy Network for Drug Policy
2. Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
3. Japan Advocacy Network for Drug Policy & Women’s DARC
4. Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, British Columbia, Canada

This briefing paper provides an overview of drug use in Japan, regulatory efforts by police and the judiciary, governmental and legislative responses and support for people who use drugs amongst civil society actors. The paper ends with a number of recommendations developed on the basis of this information.

Since 1995, the proportion of people in Japan who have used drugs in their lifetime has been estimated to be 2-3%, while the proportion who have used drugs in the past year has been estimated to be as low as 0.1%. The most commonly used drugs are methamphetamine and organic solvents (e.g. paint thinner), but the use of cannabis has increased in recent years. Since 2008, the annual number of newly reported cases of HIV in the general population has ranged from 1,600 to 1,400. Approximately 70-80% of those cases are among men who have sex with men, many of whom reported having used drugs during sex.

Stimulants, opioids, cannabis and other drugs are regulated by six laws in Japan, which will be described in detail below. These laws impose severe penalties for all activities associated with the illicit drug trade, with the maximum penalty for drug offences being life imprisonment. As a result, 14,019 people were arrested for drug offences in 2017 alone. Of those, 73% involved methamphetamine, with personal use and possession accounting for 90%. The proportion of repeat offenders, accounting for two thirds of arrests, has recently increased while the overall number of arrestees and first-time offenders fell. The application of severe penalties against drug offenders has led to a large proportion of the prison population being incarcerated for drug offences – in 2017, 27.7% of new male prisoners and 36.7% of new female prisoners were imprisoned for methamphetamine-related offences. While alternatives to incarceration do exist, including a system of suspended sentences es- tablished in 2016, the overall response remains puni- tive in nature.

Unsurprisingly, in Japan, drug use is viewed chiefly as a criminal matter, with emphasis placed on its eradication through intolerance and punishment. The Japanese government’s drug policy is described in its Five-Year Drug Abuse Prevention Strategy. That strategy focuses on education and public awareness, treatment and reintegration of people who use drugs, crackdowns on drug dealers and users, prevention of smuggling and international cooperation. The government’s support for people who use drugs, however, remains inadequate. While the government has finally recognised the effectiveness of harm reduction in other countries at international meetings, it opposes its introduction in Japan and has expressed opposition to the inclusion of harm reduction approaches in UN recommendations on drug policy. Support for drug dependence in the community is largely left to self-help groups, with limited support from medical institutions. Although advocacy for the health and human rights of people who use drugs has been gaining ground over the past decade, led by people with lived experience, their family and their supporters, a view to understanding drug use as a health issue is lacking, and it has become crucial to improve the provision of social support for people who use drugs and respect for their human rights.

Drug use, regulations and policy in Japan

The Organization of American States (OAS) today launched the "Practical Guide to Inclusive Rights-Focused Responses to COVID-19 in the Americas." The guide seeks to support OAS member states in responding to the pandemic, offering them a series of tools to consider responses that take into account the particular circumstances of groups in a situation of vulnerability.

"This pandemic affects all of us, directly or indirectly," said the Secretary General of the OAS, Luis Almagro. "However, for people in situations of vulnerability, the reach of the impact is much deeper and could, very probably, increase the gaps in their access to their basic economic, social and cultural rights. We know that our political systems are going to suffer, that our social fabrics are going to suffer, but we cannot emerge from this situation either less democratic nor with fewer rights. Let us use this challenging moment to reinforce the values that we believe are indispensable for life and human development, and ensure that the people most excluded in our societies are neither left out nor left behind, not for a minute more."

The Secretary General warned that the capacity to survive the pandemic "is much less likely" for people in situations of poverty and extreme poverty, as well as for groups historically discriminated against, such as women, indigenous peoples, afro-descendants, older persons, people with disabilities, migrants or refugees, lesbians, gay, bisexual, trans or intersex (LGBTI), children, adolescents, and people behind bars.

The guide points out that, under emergency situations such as the pandemic, and in a regional context marked by inequality and social exclusion, the vulnerability of these groups worsens. That is why the OAS, through this guide, points out that the member states must place emphasis on guaranteeing the right to health of these groups, using objective and reasonable criteria of distinction, based on the equalization of opportunities to bridge the inequality gap, and avoid arbitrary differences in treatment.

"It is clear that the threat and uncertainty generated by the current global pandemic situation cannot be addressed by any country individually," said the Director of the Department of Social Inclusion of the OAS Secretariat for Access to Rights and Equity, Betilde. Muñoz-Pogossian. “If this unprecedented emergency is teaching us anything, it is that the health of the region and the world depend on the quality of access to health care of each person. The emergency caused by COVID-19 also appeals to the sense of solidarity and cooperation that has characterized the region.”

Practical guide to inclusive rights-focused responses to COVID-19 in the Americas

Building on the previous two European Chemsex Forums, the third European Chemsex Forum took place on 14-26 November 2019 in Paris. The Forum aimed to provide participants with the tools to develop and improve multi-sectoral responses appropriate to their settings and provide a platform to engage in international, multi-disciplinary dialogue and discussions around chemsex. Chemsex was defined as the use of specific drugs ("Chems") in sexual contexts by gay, bisexual, men who have sex with men and trans* people.

The Forum programme focused on 3 key work areas:

The pursuit of sexual pleasure and the right to health

Multi-sectoral responses at local level and adaptation of services to respond to needs

Harm reduction strategies and support for chemsexers

The Forum started with an evening plenary session and was followed by two full days of presentations and discussions, with Day One looking at data and evidence across Europe and Day Two focusing on the community response to chemsex. The film ParTy Boi: Black Diamonds in Ice Castles was presented by director Micheal Rice on Friday the 15th of November.

220 people registered, 193 were able to participate in the Forum over three days, bringing together chemsex veterans, chemsex responders, healthcare providers, researchers, therapists, policy makers, service providers and service users from 23 countries.

Some clear guiding principles emerged from the 3rd Forum:

Forum participants asserted that people engaged in chemsex and chemsex responders need to be included in all intersectoral approaches. Time and again presentations called for more integration of people-centred approaches where people engaged in chemsex and chemsex responders themselves are welcomed into collaborations, across sectors and services, with other key decision-makers in their locales.

In some locations, community-based organisations (like LGBTQ+ and HIV organisations) and/or broader social structures (like city government), institutions (like the police) or services (like drugs services) have been seen to be underperforming or stigmatising regarding chemsex response. This report also presents instances of excellent collaborations, which DO provide integrated services. These are models that can be shared in different locales for your local work.

While there was attention at the Forum to issues amongst migrants, racial and ethnic minorities, sex workers and trans people, too often it was to note the work not yet done or lacking the proper capacity to be done well. It is essential for people aiming to provide health and social services, as well as organisations representing these underrepresented populations, to work with those engaged in chemsex and chemsex responders. We need cooperation and inclusive strategies to address issues related to problematic chemsex.

We’re not just addressing chemsex in our response; we’re addressing our environments in which some people with needs and talents are provided with resources and succeed while others are denied resources and fail. At the Forum, Bernard Kelly cited Montserrat Guibernau, a Spanish politician, who identified five dimensions of belonging: psychological, territorial, cultural, political and historical. In the last 20 years, Bernard stated, the gay community had retreated from many of these dimensions. His comments chime with recent research by John Pachankis at Yale which focuses on gay community stress as an additional stigma source (alongside social stigma, institutional stigma and self-stigma) contributing to high rates of suicide, depression, anxiety and substance misuse in LGBTQ+ populations.

This community stress leads directly to the need for increased attention to the dynamics amongst people engaged in chemsex. A number of presentations noted a lack of agreed understanding of harm, play, consent, and responsibility which showed that education was needed around the notions of self-empowerment and boundaries, the right to self-determination and the ability to say “no”’.

European Chemsex Forum report

Similar advocacy notes have been published with a focus on Africa, Europe and Latin America.

Prisons and detention facilities are a high-risk environment for the spread of COVID-19, especially where they are overcrowded, cannot maintain adequate standards of sanitation and hygiene, and are limited in their capacity to ensure access to medical treatment.

In several countries around the world, the heightened risks of COVID-19 infection in prisons, combined with new restrictions on visits and communication with people outside prison, has intensified anxiety and tensions amongst people held within them, in some cases resulting in riots, escapes and violence.

Ensuring the safety and health of both prison staff, and people deprived of liberty, requires urgent action to reduce the risks and consequences of widespread COVID-19 infection. This advocacy note makes recommendations for reducing such risks and consequences, including by early release from, and suspension of arrests and admission into, prions, jails and other detention settings including drug rehabilitation centres in Southeast Asia.

COVID-19: Prisons and detention in Southeast Asia

: Josefina Alfonsín, Gerardo Contreras Ruvalcaba, Kenya Cuevas, Teresa García Castro, María Santos, Ari Vera Morales

Across the world, trans women have been subjected to discrimination, criminalization, and institutional violence. They often face social exclusion, violations of their human rights, and transphobia. In many cases, these factors lead to them working in highly criminalized informal economies, such as the drug trade, sex work, or sex for survival. As a result, police profile them as being dangerous, making them more vulnerable to police abuse and to being incarcerated. While data is sorely lacking, our research indicates that trans women are overrepresented in prison as compared to other groups, and they are much more likely to suffer abuse and violence behind bars than other populations. In addition to the challenges that incarceration imposes on any person deprived of liberty, trans women face particular challenges with regard to housing, their identification, body searches, access to medical services, privacy, and conjugal visits, among other issues. Despite this situation, trans women who have been deprived of liberty have demonstrated their capacity for agency and created organizations to defend their rights. In countries such as Argentina, Mexico, and Uruguay, groups of trans women are building a social movement based on different types of resistance and the development of political agendas.

Meanwhile, the absence of standards and public policies to protect the rights of trans women deprived of liberty is widespread in Latin American countries. The lack of disaggregated data, efforts to monitor this population’s situation of vulnerability, and related studies have deepened ignorance about these realities and hindered public policy design. Given the dearth of information on this issue, this report explores the framework of rights protection for trans women deprived of liberty, the statistical data available, structural inequalities existing prior to detention, living conditions in contexts of confinement, post-release social reintegration, trans women’s experiences of agency, along with good practices in the region. Furthermore, the report provides public policy recommendations to guarantee the full exercise of this population’s dignity and protection of its human rights.

: Almas Cautivas A.C, Casa Hogar Paola Buenrostro, Casa de las Muñecas Tiresias A.C., Dejusticia, Equis Justicia para las Mujeres, International Drug Policy Consortium (IDPC), Procuración Penitenciaria de la Nación de Argentina, Red Corpora en Libertad, Washington Office on Latin America (WOLA)

Trans women deprived of liberty: Invisible stories behind bars

This guide is aimed at those who work with and advocate for women who use drugs in all their diversity. It equips them with practical, evidence-based interventions which will help advance the sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) of women who use drugs. It is based on the experiences of Frontline AIDS partners and others in implementing community-led harm reduction programmes in Kenya, India, Indonesia, Nigeria, Tanzania, Uganda and Ukraine from 2011 to 2020 through the Community Action on Harm Reduction (CAHR), PITCH, and Integrated Harm Reduction programmes, and others. It is informed by the recommendations of the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights 2018 report. The guide was developed in consultation with communities of women who inject drugs in select countries, and technical input was provided by the Women and Harm Reduction (WHRIN) Advisory Group.

Part 1 describes the current context for women who use drugs in relation to their SRHR. This part includes considerations of available data; the intersection of drug use with gender inequality, gender norms and stereotypes that create additional barriers to services for women who use drugs; and gender-based violence. It introduces the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights’ 2018 definition of SRHR, and the essential service package, alongside the World Health Organization’s package for comprehensive harm reduction services.

Part 2 elaborates seven essential SRHR interventions for women who use drugs, and an additional sub-section on the sexual health and well-being of women who use drugs. Short case studies from Frontline AIDS and partners’ harm reduction programmes, as well as other NGOs, provide examples of successful interventions. In conclusion, we draw on priority recommendations from the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission for achieving SRHR that are most relevant to the context of women who use drugs.

Publications