Following the groundbreaking call last month by the World Health Organization (WHO) for countries to stop criminalizing drug use and treat the issue as a public health one, this infographic outlines the stance of a handful of UN agencies toward drug decriminalization.

The WHO is not alone in it's calls for the removal of criminal sanctions, but certain prominent agencies seem intent on refusing to publicly advocate decriminalization (the UNODC, for one) or ignoring past statements that suggest their openness to liberalizing drug laws (the INCB).

Keep up-to-date with drug policy developments by subscribing to the IDPC Monthly Alert

Infographic: Where UN agencies stand on drug decriminalisation

Militarized Drug War Feeds Forced Migration and Mass Incarceration

52,000 Latin American Children Fleeing Home to Border and 2.7 Million U.S. Children with Parent Behind Bars

In recent weeks, the plight of the 52,000 unaccompanied children apprehended at the U.S.border since last October, many of whom are fleeing drug war violence in Central America, haspermeated our national consciousness. The devastating consequences of the drug war have notonly been felt in Latin America, they are also having ravaging effects here at home. All toooften, children are on the frontlines of this misguided war that knows no borders or color lines.

In Latin America, the core of this crisis can be directly linked to the longstanding drug war theUnited States has waged in the region. The U.S.’s militarization campaign to combat drugtrafficking has resulted in the destabilization of major parts of Central America, increasedmurder rates, and mass disappearances. Half of the 10 cities with the highest homicide rates in the world are found in the small region of Central America. This epidemic of violence destroys lives and diminishes opportunities for creating viable livelihoods, leaving children in these countries with little choice but to embark on the treacherous journey to the U.S. in search of refuge and safety.

In the U.S., the drug war has fueled unprecedented levels of mass incarceration, the brunt of which is borne by African‐American communities. The U.S. incarcerates more people for drug offenses than Western Europe incarcerates for all offenses combined. Though African‐Americans represent only 13 percent of the population, they comprise more than 40 percent of those incarcerated for drug law violations, despite similar rates of use and sales across racial and ethnic lines. This indefensible situation tears apart families and communities, leaving children vulnerable. 2.7 million children are growing up in U.S. households in which one or more parents are incarcerated, many of whom are for nonviolent drug offenses. These children are forced to live apart from their parents because of the inhumane commitment to incarceration the country has embraced for more than 40 years.

In the face of this spiraling tragedy that continues to disproportionately consume the lives and futures of black and brown children, it is imperative to end the nefarious militarization and mass incarceration occurring in the name of the war on drugs. So often, repressive drug policies are touted as measures to protect the welfare of our children, but in reality, they do little more than serve as one great big Child Endangerment Act.

On behalf of the children, it is time to rethink the war on drugs.

Click here to see the civil rights, immigration, criminal justice, racial justice, human rights, libertarian and religious organizations that signed on to this letter.

Keep up-to-date with drug policy developments by subscribing to the IDPC Monthly Alert.

80 organisations call for an end to the drug war in order to protect children

The House of Representatives on Tuesday passed House Resolution 4709, the Ensuring Patient Access and Drug Enforcement Act of 2014. The measure sponsored by Rep. Tom Marino (R-PA) passed on a voice vote.

Attempts in recent years to tighten up access to opiate pain medications have led to insistent charges that legitimate pain patients are left to suffer needlessly. This bill attempts to both reduce the diversion of prescription medications and ensure that people with medical needs for them have access.

US House passes pain medications bill

As part of its on-going efforts to ensure the meaningful engagement of civil society and affected populations in its work, the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria has launched a new “Community, Rights and Gender Technical Assistance Program”. Through this programme, national-level civil society networks and organisations, networks of key populations, and Country Coordinating Mechanisms (CCMs) can request bespoke support, advice and training to help them engage with the Global Fund processes in their country.

The program is one of a number of special initiatives aimed at strengthening community and civil society engagement in countries that are eligible for Global Fund support. In particular, technical assistance is being offered for situational analyses and needs assessments, translating Global Fund documents into local languages, assessments of legal environments, community engagement in the “country dialogue” process, training on effective advocacy, and supporting programme design – among other things.

The technical assistance is being provided by a number of specialist civil society and key population networks and organisations – who were selected by the Global Fund following an open tender process. The documents below describe the programme in further detail, and additional queries can be sent to CRGTA@theglobalfund.org.

The Global Fund launches new technical assistance programme for civil society organisations

August 31 is International Overdose Awareness Day

We are encouraging everyone to add their voice to a day calling attention to reducing the global scale of drug fatalities.

The best estimates, from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) indicate that nearly 200,000 people die each year from drug overdoses.

The international community needs to talk more about overdose and how to drive down the number of deaths. International Overdose Awareness Day, an initiative of Penington Institute, is a day for raising a united voice for preventing overdose, for saving lives.

We want as many groups as possible to stage events and let their communities know the campaign is an international day of action. Last year events were held around the world, including in Australia, Bahrain, Belgium, Canada, China, India, the Slovak Republic, the United Kingdom and the United States.

We want this to be just the beginning.Grassroots community level action is at the heart of the day because it shows that people lost to drug overdose are individuals and family members, not just statistics. Often the strongest supporters of the day are the families of overdose victims who do not want other families to suffer as they have.

Therefore many groups are marking the day by staging a memorial event in conjunction with an overdose response training session. Momentum is building for making overdose prevention programs available to all who need them, and marking the day by informing as many people as possible can save lives.

Harm Reduction International (legal name International Harm Reduction Association) is currently accepting nominations for their Board of Directors. The International Harm Reduction Association is an international, not-for-profit NGO and a company limited by guarantee in accordance with company law in England and Wales.

Harm Reduction International is seeking to fill four (4) seats on the Board, for terms of three years each. These seats will be filled via direct election by paid-up HRI members at their Annual General Meeting on 18 September 2014.

The Board of Directors is the governing body of the organisation. The full Board meets twice annually at HRI’s offices in London. These meetings are for two days each, and attendance is expected of all Board members. Costs for Board travel and accommodation are covered by HRI. 

The next full Board meeting will be held in London on 16/17 October 2014, and if applying for election to the Board you are also confirming your availability and willingness to attend that meeting on those dates.

Communication between meetings is by email, and in English only.

Eligible nominees must be aged 16 or over at the date of appointment. Only current, paid members of the HRI may be appointed to the Board. For information on becoming a paid member please click HERE.

As an international non-governmental organisation, HRI values nominations from passionate harm reduction advocates from around the world.

They strongly encourage nominations from people who use drugs and people living with HIV.

Closing date for nominations is 25 August 2014. You can download the nomination form at the link below, which includes information on process and submission.

Call for nominations – HRI Board of Directors

Globally, an estimated 10 million people who inject drugs are living with hepatitis C – with prevalence as high as 90 per cent in some places with the harshest drug policies.

In many parts of the world, injecting drug use is driving hepatitis C epidemics. Not only is the use of unsterile injecting equipment a highly efficient method of transmission for the virus, but the situation is made much worse by the legal and social environment in which these injections occur.

In almost every country, people who use drugs are criminalised, stigmatised and demonised. They are harassed by the police, ostracised by health workers, detained, bribed, tortured and beaten. They rarely have sufficient access to health services, and even when they do they can be understandably reluctant to access prevention, testing and treatment.

This is just one of the negative impacts of the so-called “war on drugs” – a repressive, punitive approach to drugs implemented in the vain hope of achieving a drug-free world. Despite their focus on “the health and welfare of mankind”, the current international drug control conventions have allowed countries to focus their energy and money on law enforcement rather than public health. In practice, this has led to a war on people who use drugs – resulting in mass incarceration, executions and extrajudicial killings around the world.

Last year, the Global Commission on Drug Policy – an independent group of high-profile public figures including Kofi Annan, Richard Branson, Michel Kazatchkine and the former leaders of Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Greece, Mexico, Poland, Portugal and Switzerland – launched a report that documents the links between drug policies and hepatitis, and calls for major reforms in order to undo the damage that has been done.

They recommended that governments act decisively and fast, acknowledging the hepatitis C epidemic among people who inject drugs, redirecting funding into health services rather than criminal justice systems, and ending the criminalisation of drug use and possession for personal use.

Speaking at the time of the report, Ruth Dreifuss (Global Commissioner, and former President of Switzerland) said “The war on drugs is a war on common sense. The hepatitis C epidemic, totally preventable and curable, is yet another proof that the drug policy status quo has failed us all miserably”.

The theme for this year’s World Hepatitis Day is ‘Think Again’. Amidst the global calls for more testing and more affordable treatment, spare a thought for those who cannot safely access health services, who are systematically denied treatment and simple ‘harm reduction’ services that can halt the spread of the virus.

Take some time to think also about the US$100 billion that is estimated to be spent on global drug law enforcement every year – how much hepatitis prevention, treatment and care could be funded if just a small amount of this money was redirected.

The “war on drugs” does not work: drug markets are as strong now as they ever have been. So why is more scrutiny not being given to the public spending on an ineffective, outdated and harmful policy?

According to the UN’s own figures, more than half of all people who inject drugs are living with hepatitis C. Until we stop criminalising these individuals, we cannot prevent this “viral time bomb” from exploding.

Jamie Bridge is Senior Policy and Operations Manager at the International Drug Policy Consortium and is currently Chair of the National Needle Exchange Forum in England.

Hepatitis C and the war on drugs

Drugreporter's new movie, filmed at the AIDS 2014 conference in Melbourne, explores the most effective tools for ending the HIV epidemic

The international AIDS conference was overshadowed by the tragedy of flight MH17. Six well-known HIV researchers and activists were on board, on their way to Melbourne, when separatist forces shot down the plane.

According to some speculation, widely publicised in the media, “The cure for AIDS might have been on the plane”. But are we really that close to ending the HIV epidemic? Does it depend on one “secret formula” that might have been travelling in the suitcase of Dr. Joep Lange, former head of the International AIDS Society? Not really.

The reality is, as usual, far more complicated. But in a sense, all these six professionals knew the antidotes for HIV, and worked hard to raise awareness of them. The Drugreporter film crew attended the conference to find out what works to end AIDS for good and all.

Was the Cure for AIDS on the Malaysian Flight?

The World Health Organization’s (WHO) call for the decriminalisation of drugs will be taken up by Danish politicians in the autumn. In the WHO report, which focused on international HIV prevention, the UN agency encourages countries to stop criminalising the use of drugs.

“Countries should work toward developing policies and laws that decriminalise injection and other use of drugs and, thereby, reduce incarceration,” the report read.

The report’s recommendation, and Denmark’s overall approach to its national drug policy, will be on the political agenda when politicians return to Christiansborg following summer holiday.

“I can go as far today as to say that I think WHO’s message is in line with what has been a Social Democratic position,” Flemming Møller Mortensen, the health spokesman for the governing Social Democrats, told Information.

“I will take up a discussion with Parliament’s Health Committee [Sundhedsudvalget] after summer holiday and will recommend that the committee carry out a hearing,” he added.

The Social Democrats have had a very public split over drug policy. Copenhagen’s mayor Frank Jensen, the party’s vice chair, has vocally advocated for the legalisation of cannabis, while his party’s national leaders, including PM Helle Thorning-Schmidt, have repeatedly rejected his proposal.

Denmark to look at decriminalising drugs

Richard Branson has recently launched his new blog and aims at giving his opinion while sensibilizing people about the changes and new perspectives needed in drug-related issues.

"Making smart changes to global drug policies could have a massive impact upon transmission rates of HIV and other infectious diseases. I was honoured to take part in a fascinating discussion on this topic at the International AIDS Conference in Melbourne.

The way we treat drug use has a massive impact on our capacity to tackle some of the most serious public health issues of our day.

But rather than protecting public health, the so-called War on Drugs exacerbates the risks related to drug use, such as injecting in unsupervised and unhygienic environments."

Keep up-to-date with drug policy developments by subscribing to the IDPC Monthly Alert.

How changing drug policy could save lives

The United States has an enormous prison problem. A more-than-2.4-million-prisoner-sized problem, to be precise, locked up in the archipelago of federal penitentiaries, state corrections facilities, and local jailhouses that form the nation's thriving prison-industrial complex. Since 1980, the number of incarcerated citizens in the US has more than quadrupled, an unprecedented rise that can attributed to four decades of tough-on-crime oneupmanship, and a draconian war on drugs.

A recent analysis by the Prison Policy Initiative shows that while states like Louisiana have undoubtedly led America's march toward mass incarceration, no state or region has been immune to the prison boom. And each state is a global aberration, with incarceration rates that compare to those found in isolated dictatorships and countries recovering from civil war.

As the chart shows, 36 states have higher incarceration rates than Cuba, the country with the world's second highest prison rate. New York comes in just above Rwanda, which is still trying thousands of people in connection to the 1994 genocide. Even Vermont, birthplace of Phish, Ben & Jerry's, and the country's only socialist senator, imprisons a higher percentage of its population than countries like Israel, Mexico, or Saudi Arabia.

Looked at in terms of actual inmate numbers, this means that the number of people behind bars in most US states is on par with the prison populations of entire nations. And not Luxembourg or Burundi. Big, messy countries, like Venezuela and Egypt.

The numbers, Wagner explained, underscore the central role that states have played in America’s unprecedented prison buildup. While much of the recent prison debate has centered on federal sentencing laws and drug policy reform, the real mass incarceration action has taken place at the state level. According to PPI data, more than half of US inmates—57 percent—are in state prisons, and another 30 percent are incarcerated in local jails, generally for violating state laws. Though prison rates have varied widely across the US, all 50 states have implemented some set of policies—like mandatory minimums, “truth in sentencing” policies, or “three strikes” rules—aimed at putting more people in prison for longer periods of time.

Unsurprisingly, the economic and social impacts of this trend have been massive. According to a 464-page report published by the National Research Council earlier this year, state spending on corrections increased 400 percent between 1980 and 2009. The result, the NRC points out, is that prisons are now some of the primary providers of health care, counseling, and job training to the country's most disadvantaged groups. Meanwhile, the social and cultural costs of mass incarceration are disproportionately borne by poor communities, minorities, and people with mental illnesses.

And the actual benefits of mass incarceration are minimal, at best. Sure, crime rates have gone down since 1980, but studies have found the connection between increased prison rates and lower crime is tenuous and small. In fact a report released by The Sentencing Project this week found that in states that have substantially reduced their prison population in recent years, like California, New York, and New Jersey, the crime rate has actually fallen faster than the national average.

Mass incarceration in the United States

Dr. Eliot Ross Albers, Executive Director of the International Network of People who Use Drugs discusses the importance of overcoming stigma, discrimination and criminalization for drug users and key populations in general.

News